[relaxng-user] "Converting DTDs (and DTD developers) to RELAX NG schemas" paper

[Tim Bray]

On Nov 25, 2003, at 2:49 AM, David Carlisle wrote:

> What is the current feeling amongst Relax MG practitioners, is it OK 
> to use
> the compact syntax as a normative specification of a grammar?

For Atom, I think we're going to use RNC as the "official" schema; we 
may end up also having an official .xsd because the trang-generated 
version is kinda hideous.  Nothing wrong with trang, just the usual XSD 
broken-ness. -Tim